मंगलवार, 22 जनवरी 2013

ख्वाबों में तुम थे...


सजाई  पलक  थी  करीने  से  हमने

छलक  गए   हंजू   बताऊँ   मैं  कैसे -

इरादों  में  तुम  थे  ख्वाबों में तुम थे

टुर  गए  दिल  से  बताऊँ   मैं   कैसे -

छाया भी थे तुम सरमाया भी तुम थे 

बिखर  गए   ऐसे   बताऊँ   मैं   कैसे-

तेरी  यादों  के  धागे दरख्तों  से बांधे 

निकले कमजोर इतनेबताऊँ मै कैसे

सुनीआँखों में आहट की आशाभरी है
कितनी विरानगी  है बताऊँ मैं  कैसे-

जो निकले तो ऐसे कि मुड़ के न देखे
समाये  क्षितिज  में  उठाउं  मैं  कैसे- 


 

                            -  उदय वीर सिंह

8 टिप्‍पणियां:

बेनामी ने कहा…

Editorial Information: Prior History how do get rid of ringing in the ears http://africanartstall.com/sitemap.xml how to manage your tinnitus a step-by-step workbook SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
The Fifth District relied on its decisions in Hopps v. Smith, 520 So.2d 673 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 529 So.2d 695 (Fla. 1988), and Dickson v. Dunn, 399 So.2d 447 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), in reaching the decision in this case. See Caufield, 745 So.2d at 436. In Dickson, the court found that buyers suing for misrepresentation of improvements to realty could not recover attorney's fees based on a clause in the contract providing for such fees to the prevailing party as a result of a suit arising out of the contract. The Fifth District reasoned that based on Chanin v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 89 F.2d 889, 891 (7th Cir. 1937), the subject litigation arose out of a claim of misrepresentation in the inducement of the contract, not the contract itself. Likewise, in Hopps, relying on Dickson, the Fifth District again held a misrepresentation claim did not arise out of the contract for sale of the property. There, the court stressed accord with this reasoning in other Florida district courts. See Location 100, Inc. v. Gould S.E.L. Computer Systems, Inc., 517 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (finding in a breach of contract suit where vendor did not ensure ingress or egress to property that buyer could not recover attorney's fees stemming from a fraud counterclaim because such claim is one in tort and not in contract); Keys Lobster, Inc. v. Ocean Divers, Inc., 468 So.2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (finding in an action to force vendor to specifically perform that the prevailing party was not entitled to attorney's fees for first three counts of complaint which were based on fraud). otc tinnitus medication http://africanartstall.com tinnitus evaluation software VALENTIN BEREZA, Petitioner, v. H. ANNETTE JONES, as Guardian Ad Litem of TATIANA BEREZA, a minor, Respondent

Madan Mohan Saxena ने कहा…

बहुत ही सुन्दर.

ई. प्रदीप कुमार साहनी ने कहा…

आपकी इस उत्कृष्ट पोस्ट की चर्चा बुधवार (23-01-13) के चर्चा मंच पर भी है | अवश्य पधारें |
सूचनार्थ |

डॉ. रूपचन्द्र शास्त्री मयंक (उच्चारण) ने कहा…

बहुत सुन्दर प्रस्तुति!

प्रवीण पाण्डेय ने कहा…

सुन्दर कविता..स्वप्नों की निराली दुनिया..

रश्मि शर्मा ने कहा…

कि‍तना अच्‍छा लि‍खा है.....मैं ये बताउं कैसे ?

धीरेन्द्र सिंह भदौरिया ने कहा…

वाह,,,बहुत ही लाजबाब,

recent post: गुलामी का असर,,,

Maheshwari kaneri ने कहा…

बहुत ही सुन्दर....